Evaluation and analysis
- •
Analysis and evaluation
- •
Map each question to data, preprocessing, analysis, assumptions, otuputs, and interpretation criteria; distinguish planned analyses from exploration
- •
training data fit a model, validation data guide choices, and test data estimate final performance after choices are fixed. split according to the intended claim: keep related or duplicate cases together and preserve time order for future prediction
- •
- •
Cross-validation and leakage
- •
in -fold cross-validation, train on folds and test on the remaining fold in turn. Stratified, grouped, or time-aware folds address class balance, dependence, or time order.
- •
Fit learned preprocessing inside each training fold. Leakage occurs wheninformation unavailable at prediction time affects evaluation, such as scaling before splitting, duplicates across partitions, futrue data, or repeated test-set tuning
- •
- •
Confidence interval
- •
convidence interval covers the target parameter in about of repeated samples under its assumptions; it does not mean of observations lie in the interval or remove bias.
- •
The handout poll example (, ) gives a simple-random-sample approximation of percentage points, which does not validate its design, weighting, or measurement.
- •
- •
- •